Infección de prótesis aórtica abdominal: tratamiento alternativo / Infected abdominal aortic prosthesis: an alternative therapy

Introducción: la infección de prótesis aórtica en la cirugía vascular convencional es un evento catastrófico, con una alta tasa de morbilidad y de mortalidad. El tratamiento tradicional ha sido la remoción de la prótesis y la reconstrucción con bypass extraanatómico. En algunos casos, se ha llevado a cabo el reemplazo con prótesis impregnadas en antibiótico; en otros, el reemplazo con vena femoral superficial y también la cirugía abierta con drenaje de las colecciones asociadas y antibioticoterapia de por vida. Caso clínico: se presenta el reporte de un caso de infección protésica tratada con drenajes de las colecciones y antibioticoterapia de larga duración, con un resultado favorable un año después de su complicación. Discusión: en algunos casos, dada la severidad del paciente, es posible intentar un tratamiento conservador de esta nefasta complicación.(AU)

Introduction: in traditional vascular surgery, aortic prosthesis infection is a catastrophic event with high morbidity andmortality rates. Traditional treatment is the removal of the valve followed by extra-anatomic bypass reconstruction. Insome cases, antibiotic-impregnated prosthesis replacement has been performed. In others, superficial femoral veinreplacement, and open surgery with drainage of the associated collections and lifelong antibiotic therapy.Case report: this is the case of a patient with aortic prosthesis infection undergoing draining collections and lifelongantibiotic therapy with a favorable outcome 1 year after the complication.Discussion: in some cases, given the severity of the patient, we can try to treat this dreaded complication conservativel.(AU)

Effect of Antibiotic Spacer Dosing on Treatment Success in Two-Stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

INTRODUCTION: In two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), adding antibiotics to cement spacers is the standard of care; however, little is known about optimal dosage. There is emphasis on using >3.6 g of total antibiotic, including ≥2.0 g of vancomycin, per 40 g of cement, but these recommendations lack clinical evidence. We examined whether recommended antibiotic spacer doses affect treatment success. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 202 patients who underwent two-stage exchange for PJI from 2004 to 2020 with at least 1-year follow-up. Patients were separated into high (>3.6 g of total antibiotic per 40 g of cement) and low-dose spacer groups. Primary outcomes were overall and infectious failure. RESULTS: High-dose spacers were used in 80% (162/202) of patients. High-dose spacers had a reduced risk of overall (OR, 0.37; P = 0.024) and infectious (OR, 0.35; P = 0.020) failure for infected primary arthroplasties, but not revisions. In multivariate analysis, vancomycin dose ≥2.0 g decreased the risk of infectious failure (OR, 0.31; P = 0.016), although not overall failure (OR, 0.51; P = 0.147). CONCLUSION: During two-stage exchange for PJI, spacers with greater than 3.6 g of total antibiotic may reduce overall and infectious failure for infected primary arthroplasties. Furthermore, using at least 2.0 g of vancomycin could independently decrease the risk of infectious failure.

Articulating Spacers in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique and Outcomes.

Although one-stage exchange arthroplasty is gaining popularity, two-stage exchange arthroplasty remains the gold standard for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections. Use of an articulating spacer for this procedure offers an avenue for maintaining hip motion and controlled weight-bearing, allowing local antibiotic elution. However, there is no uniform consensus on the optimal surgical protocol for using articulating spacers. This review describes the surgical technique for undertaking a first-stage exchange arthroplasty using an articulating spacer and discusses the pertinent literature on key concepts relating to periprosthetic joint infections in total hip arthroplasty to guide effective surgical decision making in these patients.

Innovations in the Isolation and Treatment of Biofilms in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Comprehensive Review of Current and Emerging Therapies in Bone and Joint Infection Management.

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a devastating complication of joint arthroplasty surgeries that are often complicated by biofilm formation. The development of biofilms makes PJI treatment challenging as they create a barrier against antibiotics and host immune responses. This review article provides an overview of the current understanding of biofilm formation, factors that contribute to their production, and the most common organisms involved in this process. This article focuses on the identification of biofilms, as well as current methodologies and emerging therapies in the management of biofilms in PJI.

Cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation and betadine decontaminate nosocomial pathogens from implant surfaces.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty is a major concern requiring multiple surgeries and antibiotic interventions. Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli are the predominant causes of these infections. Due to biofilm formation, antibiotic treatment for patients with PJI can prolong resistance, further complicating the use of current treatments. Previous research has shown that cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation (CVCES) is an effective technique to prevent/treat implant-associated biofilm infections on titanium (Ti) surfaces. This study thus evaluated the efficacy of CVCES via the use of 10% betadine alone and in combination with CVCES to eradicate lab-grown biofilms on cemented and cementless cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and Ti surfaces. CVCES treatment alone for 24 hours demonstrated no detectable CFU for E. coli and P. aeruginosa biofilms on cementless CoCr implants. In the presence of cement, E. coli biofilms had 106 CFUs/implant remaining after CVCES treatment alone; however, P. aeruginosa biofilms on cemented implants were reduced to below detectable limits. The use of 10% betadine treatment for 3 minutes followed by 24-hour CVCES treatment brought CFU levels to below detectable limits in E. coli and P. aeruginosa. The same was true for S. aureus biofilms on cementless patellofemoral implants as well as femoral and tibial implants. These treatment methods were not sufficient for eradication of S. aureus biofilms on cemented implants. These results suggest that CVCES alone and CVCES with 10% betadine are effective approaches to treating biofilms formed by certain bacterial species potentially leading to the treatment of PJI.IMPORTANCEPeriprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are problematic due to requiring multiple surgeries and antibiotic therapies that are responsible for increased patient morbidity and healthcare costs. These infections become resistant to antibiotic treatment due to the formation of biofilms on the orthopedic surfaces. Cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation (CVCES) has previously been shown to be an effective technique to prevent and treat biofilm infections on different surfaces. This study shows that CVCES can increase the efficacy of 10% betadine irrigation used in debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention by 99.9% and clear infection to below detection limits. PJI treatments are at times limited, and CVCES could be a promising technology to improve patient outcomes.

Absorbable antibiotic beads for treatment of LVAD driveline infections.

BACKGOUND: Infections of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) driveline are a dreaded complication that results in high mortality and morbidity. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed five consecutive patients with severe continuous-flow LVAD (HVAD, Heartmate 2, and Heartmate 3) driveline infection. These infections, which developed on an average of 960.4 ± 843.9 days after LVAD placement, were refractory to systemic antibiotics and local wound care. All were treated with extensive surgical debridement, local installation of absorbable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads (vancomycin and tobramycin), primary wound closure, and 6 weeks of systemic antibiotics after surgery. RESULTS: Four patients had resolution of DLI, and one had a recurrent infection at another part of the driveline 7 months after the complete resolution of the previous site. This patient was successfully treated with debridement and bead placements. Three patients still have their LVADs, while two received orthotopic heart transplants. At the time of the transplant, there was no evidence of gross infection of the LVAD drivelines or pumps. At the average follow-up time of 425.8 ± 151 days, no patients have an active infection. CONCLUSION: Treatment of LVAD driveline infection with absorbable antibiotic beads with primary wound closure is a viable option and merits further investigation.

Clinical outcomes of rifampicin combination therapy in implant-associated infections due to staphylococci and streptococci: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Adjunctive rifampicin for implant-associated infections is controversial. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of rifampicin combination therapy compared with monotherapy in treating prosthetic joint infection (PJI) or prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) due to staphylococci and streptococci. METHODS: A systematic search was performed from inception to 13 June 2022 in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane and Web of Science to investigate the clinical outcomes of rifampicin combination therapy compared with monotherapy in treating staphylococcal and streptococcal PJI or PVE. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included. A moderate quality of evidence was found in favour of rifampicin in patients with staphylococcal PJI who underwent a debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure [odds ratio = 2.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.93-3.23]. Including the two RCTs only, adding rifampicin to the antibiotic regimen after DAIR was also in favour of rifampicin, but this was not statistically significant (risk ratio = 1.27, 95% CI 0.79-2.04; n = 126). Pooling data for patients with staphylococcal PJI who underwent a two-stage procedure showed that adding rifampicin was not associated with therapeutic success. Limited evidence was found for the use of rifampicin for PVE caused by staphylococci. CONCLUSIONS: Adding rifampicin in the treatment of staphylococcal PJI treated by DAIR clearly increased the likelihood for therapeutic success. The clinical benefit of adjunctive rifampicin in the treatment of other staphylococci and streptococci implant-associated infections is still unclear.

Adjuvant intra-articular vancomycin for recalcitrant Staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic prosthetic joint infection patients who fail conventional two-stage revision surgery are an especially difficult to treat patient population. Consequently, the objective of this study was to investigate the safety and long-term effectiveness of adjuvant intra-articular vancomycin therapy in conjunction with two-stage revision knee arthroplasties for recalcitrant Staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study of twelve patients with recalcitrant Staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections of the knee which had failed previous revision surgeries. Each patient subsequently underwent two-stage revision with placement of Hickman catheters to deliver intra-articular vancomycin therapy. In addition, systemic antibiotic therapy was administered for 6 weeks, and long-term follow-up was evaluated then for 5 years. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of the cohort have had no recurrence of their infections at 5 years. Two patients formed fistulas requiring above the knee amputations, and three patients had acute kidney injury. All patients had maximum measurable serum vancomycin trough levels that ranged from 6.1 to 93.6 mcg/mL. CONCLUSION: The aggressive protocol used in this cohort with repeat two-stage revision surgery, intra-articular vancomycin and systemic antibiotics was able to prevent recurrence of infection in most patients, but higher than expected rates of acute kidney injury were observed in this study. Therefore, while intra-articular vancomycin therapy may have some effectiveness in treating recalcitrant prosthetic joint infections, its ability to eradicate all bacterial niduses is unproven, and clinicians should be cognizant of potential adverse events that can occur with this therapy.

Outcomes after débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for prosthetic joint infection in shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo total shoulder arthroplasty usually have excellent long-term outcomes. However, a subset of patients is diagnosed with a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) requiring revision procedures and prolonged recovery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of recurrent shoulder PJI in patients undergoing débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), single-stage revision, and 2-stage revision. We also sought to compare outcomes and complications across procedures. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients diagnosed with PJI after primary shoulder arthroplasty between January 2010 and August 2021. Patients were included if they underwent treatment with DAIR, single-stage revision, or 2-stage revision. Demographic information, surgical details, complications, laboratory data, postoperative antibiotic regimen, and infectious pathogen were collected. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes were collected: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Shoulder Activity Scale, and PROMIS Upper Extremity. Chi-square, t test, and 1-way analysis of variance were used as appropriate to evaluate each factor. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in the study, 26% treated with DAIR, 9% treated with single-stage revision, and 65% treated with 2-stage revision. There were no significant differences in patient comorbidities. Patients undergoing DAIR were diagnosed significantly earlier than those undergoing single- and 2-stage revision procedures (12.6 ± 22.9 months vs. 49.6 ± 48.4 vs. 25.0 ± 26.6, P = .010). Recurrent PJI was noted in 23.1% of patients: 29.4% of DAIR patients, no single-stage patients, and 23.8% of 2-stage patients (P = .330). Patients undergoing 2-stage revision with treatment failure had a significantly higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (0.2 ± 3.7 vs. 3.7 ± 3.9, P = .027). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes across groups. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing treatment of shoulder PJI with DAIR did not have an increased rate of reinfection compared with single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. Patients treated with DAIR were diagnosed with PJI significantly earlier than those undergoing single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. There was no difference in complication rates between groups. This information adds to the body of work detailing outcomes after DAIR for shoulder PJI and provides encouraging data for use in this patient population. Future studies with a larger sample size may be conducted to further investigate specific pathogens, infection timelines, and antibiotic regimens that reduce the risk of treatment failure.

Demographics and Early Outcomes of Commercial Antibiotic Cement Usage for Infection Prophylaxis During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 65 Years: An American Joint Replacement Registry Study.

INTRODUCTION: The use of antibiotic-laden bone cement (ALBC) for infection prophylaxis in the setting of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Using data from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR), (1) we examined the demographics of ALBC usage in the United States and (2) identified the effect of prophylactic commercially available ALBC on early revision and readmission for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary TKA. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of the AJRR from 2017 to 2020. Patients older than 65 years undergoing primary cemented TKA with or without the use of commercially available antibiotic cement were eligible for inclusion (N = 251,506 patients). Data were linked to available Medicare claims to maximize revision outcomes. Demographics including age, sex, race/ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), preoperative inflammatory arthritis, region, and body mass index (BMI) class were recorded. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between the two outcome measures and ALBC usage. RESULTS: Patients undergoing cemented TKA with ALBC were more likely to be Non-Hispanic Black ( P < 0.001), have a CCI of 2 or 3 ( P < 0.001), reside in the South ( P < 0.001), and had a higher mean BMI ( P < 0.001). In the regression models, ALBC usage was associated with increased risk of 90-day revision for PJI (hazards ratio 2.175 [95% confidence interval] 1.698 to 2.787) ( P < 0.001) and was not associated with 90-day all-cause readmissions. Male sex, higher CCI, and BMI >35 were all independently associated with 90-day revision for PJI. DISCUSSION: The use of commercial ALBC in patients older than 65 years for primary TKA in the AJRR was not closely associated with underlying comorbidities suggesting that hospital-level and surgeon-level factors influence its use. In addition, ALBC use did not decrease the risk of 90-day revision for PJI and was not associated with 90-day readmission rates.

High Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Following Antibiotic-Loaded Spacer Insertion for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Updated Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: The use of antibiotic-impregnated cement during 2-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection poses a risk of renal complications following spacer insertion. This systematic review aimed to investigate the rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) following antibiotic-loaded spacer insertion and to identify risk factors associated with this complication. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Scopus databases. All clinical studies that documented renal complications following antibiotic-loaded spacer insertion for periprosthetic knee (total knee arthroplasty [TKA]) or hip (total hip arthroplasty [THA]) infection were included. Articles that combined THA and TKA outcomes were also included and labeled "THA + TKA." Descriptive statistics were analyzed when data were available. RESULTS: There were 24 studies (9 THA, 7 TKA, 8 THA + TKA) included. The mean incidences of spacer-related AKI across THA, TKA, and THA + TKA cohorts were 4.2 (range, 0 to 10%), 14 (range, 0 to 19%), and 27% (range, 0 to 35%), respectively. The most common patient-related risk factors for AKI were underlying chronic kidney disease or high baseline creatinine, low preoperative hemoglobin, and blood transfusion requirement. Spacer-related risk factors included high antibiotic dosage (>3.6 g/cement batch) and antibiotic type. While most recovered without complication, select patients required hemodialysis for acute management (2 THA, 18 THA + TKA) and/or developed chronic kidney disease (8 TKA, 8 THA). CONCLUSION: The rate of AKI following spacer insertion was high and likely under-reported in the literature. Surgeons should be cognizant of this devastating complication and should closely monitor at-risk patients for AKI following antibiotic-loaded spacer insertion.

The efficacy of antibiotic-eluting material in a two-stage model of periprosthetic joint infection.

Periprosthetic joint infections occur in about 2% of patients who undergo primary total joint arthroplasty, a procedure performed over 1 million times in the United States. The gold standard of treatment is a two-stage revision. This study aimed to establish a two-stage procedure in a preclinical small animal model (rat) to test and compare the efficacy of an antibiotic-eluting material in managing infection. Joint replacement was simulated by transchondylarly implanting a polyethylene (PE) plug into the distal femur and a titanium screw in the proximal tibia. Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) 108 CFU/mL was injected into the tibial canal and the joint space before wound closure. The control groups were killed on postoperative day (POD) 18 (n = 12) and on POD 42 (n = 4) to assess both early and later-stage outcomes in the control group. The test group underwent revision surgery on POD 18 for treatment using gentamicin-eluting polyethylene (GPE, n = 4) and was observed until POD 42 to evaluate the efficacy of treatment. Our results showed that the bone loss for the treatment group receiving GPE was significantly less than that of the control (p < 0.05), which was supported by the histology images and an AI-tool assisted infection rate evaluation. Gait metrics duty factor imbalance and hindlimb temporal symmetry were significantly different between the treatment and control groups on Day 42. This animal model was feasible for evaluating treatments for peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJI) with a revision surgery and specifically that revision surgery and local antibiotic treatment largely hindered the peri-prosthetic bone loss. Statement of clinical significance: This revision model of peri-prosthetic infection has the potential of comparatively evaluating prophylaxis and treatment strategies and devices. Antibiotic-eluting UHMWPE is devised as at tool in treating PJI while providing weight bearing and joint space preservation.

Inferior Outcomes for Patients Transferred Between Surgical Stages for Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total knee arthroplasty may result in 2-stage revision surgery. There are limited data describing outcomes when the first stage is completed at an outside hospital and the patient is referred to a tertiary center. We hypothesized that patients have greater success when both surgeries occur at a single center. METHODS: There were 25 knee PJI patients who presented with an antibiotic spacer and had a minimum 2-year follow-up who were retrospectively identified at a single tertiary referral center from 2014 to 2021. A cohort matched for age, sex, body mass index, Elixhauser comorbidity measure, spacer type, infectious organism, and year of surgery was established with patients who had both stages completed at the investigating institution. Modified Delphi success criteria of no subsequent surgery or reinfection with any species were compared. RESULTS: The transferred group demonstrated a treatment success of 40% compared to 84% in the continuous group (P < .01). The transferred group was more likely to have an additional procedure between stages (44 versus 8%, P < .01), with a higher number of surgeries after primary total knee arthroplasty (4.8 versus 3.0, P < .01), between stages (1.4 versus 0.2, P < .01), and after second stage (0.8 versus 0.2, P = .03). The transferred group had longer durations between stages (20.1 versus 7.0 weeks, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Patients who have PJIs transferred between stages demonstrated higher treatment failure. Surgeons should consider transfer early with a goal of continuous management by a single institution.

How We Approach Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy Following Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

The optimal treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains uncertain. Patients undergoing debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) receive extended antimicrobial treatment, and some experts leave patients at perceived highest risk of relapse on suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT). In this narrative review, we synthesize the literature concerning the role of SAT to prevent treatment failure following DAIR, attempting to answer 3 key questions: (1) What factors identify patients at highest risk for treatment failure after DAIR (ie, patients with the greatest potential to benefit from SAT), (2) Does SAT reduce the rate of treatment failure after DAIR, and (3) What are the rates of treatment failure and adverse events necessitating treatment discontinuation in patients receiving SAT? We conclude by proposing risk-benefit stratification criteria to guide use of SAT after DAIR for PJI, informed by the limited available literature.

Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention is Well-Tolerated Without Inducing Resistance: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) maximizes reoperation-free survival. We evaluated SAT after DAIR of acutely infected primary TJA regarding: 1) adverse drug reaction (ADR)/intolerance; 2) reoperation for infection; and 3) antibiotic resistance. METHODS: Patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) DAIR for acute periprosthetic joint infection at two academic medical centers from 2015 to 2020 were identified (n = 115). Data were collected on patient demographics, infecting organisms, antibiotics, ADR/intolerances, reoperations, and antibiotic resistances. Median SAT duration was 11 months. Stepwise multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify covariates significantly associated with outcomes of interest. RESULTS: There were 11.1 and 16.3% of TKA and THA DAIR patients, respectively, who had ADR/intolerance to SAT. Patients prescribed trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (P = .0014) or combination antibiotic therapy (P = .0169) after TKA DAIR had increased risk of ADR/intolerance. There was no difference in reoperation-free survival between TKA (83.3%) and THA (65.1%) DAIR (P = .5900) at mean 2.8-year follow-up. Risk of reoperation for infection was higher among TKA Staphylococcus aureus infections (P = .0004) and lower with increased SAT duration (P < .0450). The optimal duration of SAT was nearly 2 years. No cases of antibiotic resistance developed due to SAT. CONCLUSIONS: Consider SAT after TJA DAIR due to improved reoperation-free survival and favorable safety profile. Prolonged SAT did not induce antibiotic resistance. Use trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole with caution because of the increased likelihood of ADR/intolerance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for the early prosthetic joint infection of total knee and hip arthroplasties: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents one of the most fearsome complications of joint replacement. No international consensus has been reached regarding the best approach for early prosthetic knee and hip infections. The aim of this updated systematic review is to assess whether debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is an effective choice of treatment in early postoperative and acute hematogenous PJI. METHODS: This systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The diagnostic criteria defining a PJI, the most present pathogen, and the days between the index procedure and the onset of the PJI were extracted from the selected articles. Additionally, the mean follow-up, antibiotic regimen, and success rate of the treatment were also reported. RESULTS: The articles included provided a cohort of 970 patients. Ten studies specified the joint of their cohort in PJIs regarding either hip prostheses or knee prostheses, resulting in 454 total knees and 460 total hips. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 92 years old. Success rates for the DAIR treatments in the following cohort ranged from 55.5% up to a maximum of 90% (mean value of 71%). CONCLUSION: Even though the DAIR procedure is quite limited, it is still considered an effective option for patients developing an early post-operative or acute hematogenous PJI. However, there is a lack of studies, in particular randomized control trials (RCTs), comparing DAIR with one-stage and two-stage revision protocols in the setting of early PJIs, reflecting the necessity to conduct further high-quality studies to face the burden of early PJI.

Therapeutic efficacy of vancomycin-loaded carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone hip stem for periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study.

A carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR/PEEK) hip stem with a special antibiotic elution mechanism is under development to treat periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The antibiotic elution characteristics of intramedullary implants were experimentally investigated, and the efficacy of revision surgery using a therapeutic stem in treating ovine PJI was examined. To evaluate elution characteristics, the intramedullary vancomycin-loaded CFR/PEEK cylindrical implants were inserted in the distal femur of nine sheep, and the vancomycin elution rate was measured at 2, 7, and 21 days. To evaluate therapeutic efficacy, the PJI model with staphylococcus aureus was attempted to create for five sheep. Moreover, the therapeutic vancomycin-loaded CFR/PEEK stem was implanted during one-stage revision surgery. Three weeks after revision surgery, the treatment efficacy was evaluated based on bacterial cultures and wound findings. In addition, the vancomycin elution rate from the stem was measured. On average, the cylindrical implants eluted approximately 70% vancomycin in 21 days. Of the five sheep attempting to create a PJI model, three were successfully infected with S. aureus as intended for verification of treatment efficacy. In all three joints, negative bacterial cultures and no purulence were observed 3 weeks after revision surgery. The vancomycin elution rates from the stems were >70%. Efficient elution of vancomycin was confirmed by the experimental implant inserted into the bone marrow and the stem in actual PJI treatment. Using a novel therapeutic stem with an antibiotic elution mechanism in one-stage revision surgery, successful treatment was demonstrated in all S. aureus-induced PJIs.

Performance of classical serum inflammatory markers in healed and unhealed treated patients with joint and prosthetic joint infections.

BACKGROUND: Serum markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-dimer, are currently used by clinicians and orthopedic surgeons in diagnosing and managing joint infections (JI), although conflicting results exist on their performance. The aim of this study was to evaluate their performance in assessing healing or unhealing of patients with JI or with prosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS: ESR, CRP and D-dimer serum levels were evaluated before, during and after antibiotic treatment in 61 patients (65.1 ± 12.6 years): 49 affected by PJI and 12 by JI, between 2020 and 2022. These patients had undergone orthopedic surgery and were treated with antibiotics. RESULTS: ESR, CRP and D-dimer were significantly lower after treatment than before (p value: 0.001, 0.001 and 0.003, respectively) in healed and unhealed patients. A moderate correlation was found between the three inflammatory markers. CONCLUSIONS: Using a cut off value of 25 mm/h for ESR, 0.5 mg/L for CRP, and 700 ng/ml for D-dimer, it might be possible to discriminate healed from unhealed patients (PPV and NPV: ESR 65.5% and 68.8%, CRP 71.9% and 79.3%, D-dimer 76.9% and 81.8%). The combined use of these three inflammatory markers might be useful in the management of joint infections.

Left ventricular assist device-associated driveline infections as a specific form of complicated skin and soft tissue infection/acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection - issues and therapeutic options.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review comments on the current guidelines for the treatment of wound infections under definition of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). However, wound infections around a catheter, such as driveline infections of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are not specifically listed under this definition in any of the existing guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Definitions and classification of LVAD infections may vary across countries, and the existing guidelines and recommendations may not be equally interpreted among physicians, making it unclear if these infections can be considered as ABSSSI. Consequently, the use of certain antibiotics that are approved for ABSSSI may be considered as 'off-label' for LVAD infections, leading to rejection of reimbursement applications in some countries, affecting treatment strategies, and hence, patients' outcomes. However, we believe driveline exit site infections related to LVAD can be included within the ABSSSI definition. SUMMARY: We argue that driveline infections meet the criteria for ABSSSI which would enlarge the 'on-label' antibiotic armamentarium for treating these severe infections, thereby improving the patients' quality of life.

Two-dimensional liquid chromatography measurement of meropenem concentration in synovial fluid of patients with periprosthetic joint infection.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication following joint replacement surgery. One potential treatment approach for PJI could be the combination of one-stage revision and intra-articular infusion of antibiotics. Meropenem is one of the commonly used intra-articular antibiotics in our institution. Determining the concentration of meropenem in the joint cavity could be crucial for optimizing its local application, effectively eradicating biofilm infection, and improving PJI treatment outcomes. In this study, we developed a simple, precise, and accurate method of two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2D-LC) for determining the concentration of meropenem in human synovial fluid. The method was then validated based on the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration and the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Meropenem showed good linearity in the range of 0.31-25.01 µg/mL (r ≥ .999). Selectivity, intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy, extraction recovery, and stability validation results were all within the acceptance range. This method has been successfully applied to the determination of synovial fluid samples from PJI patients, providing a useful detection method for meropenem therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in PJI patients.